← Back to News & research

Scientific studies · ARES JOURNAL

Red light and mitochondria: a 2026 finding worth examining

A human experiment separates a proposed mechanism from a demonstrated effect.

The result in context

In 12 adults, one session did not increase mitochondrial respiration in sampled skin and muscle.

Aussieker et al. · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · Study published:

Read the original source ↗

DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000004120

Which device and exposure?

Check spectrum, irradiance, dose, distance, exposed area and timing. Sharing a wavelength does not make devices equivalent. Separate general research from the model documentation.

What are the limitations?

Read funding and conflicts of interest; seek independent confirmation. Include null findings. A source should support the exact statement, without turning an experiment into a treatment recommendation.

What we cannot conclude

Small sample, acute exposure and ex vivo measurements. Abstract-based summary; not evidence about every application.

General PBM research. This page is neither a treatment protocol nor clinical validation of ARES.

How we select sources

We link identifiable scientific publications and report findings and limitations, including null results. This initial collection is not a systematic review. Studies of particular devices and protocols do not establish outcomes for ARES products.

With your consent, we use Google Analytics to measure visits and contact clicks. The site also works if you decline. An email click does not mean an enquiry was sent.

Privacy and cookies